Town of Charlton
Planning Board Minutes
784 Charlton Road
Charlton, New York 12019
Minutes of Planning Board Meeting – July 21, 2008
Acting Chairman Jay Wilkinson called the meeting to order at 7:00 p.m. at the John W. Taylor Hall.
Present: Jay Wilkinson, Acting Chairman, John Kadlecek, Connie Wood, Mark Hodgkins, Dawn Szurek, Mike Armer, Bill Keniry, Esq., Planning Board Attorney, Mike McNamara, Town Engineer, Susan York, Planning Board clerk and Kimberly Caron, Recording Secretary. Chris Mitchell joined the meeting at 7:20 p.m.
AGENDA MEETING:
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there is a quorum of five members.
Minutes
Mr. Wilkinson asked for comments on the draft of the June meeting minutes. Mrs. York previously provided comments via mail. No other comments were presented.
Public Hearings
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there are no Public Hearings.
Heflin/Durst (255-1-40.1, 41, 43.1, 43.2, 43.3)
Mr. Wilkinson stated that this is a placeholder as this matter is on hold.
Site Plan Review
MPH Properties, LLP (256-1-103)
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has received a package of information from Lansing Engineering including seven drawings and all of the information the Board has requested. Mr. Wilkinson stated that Mr. Keniry sent a letter to Lansing Engineering dated June 26, 2008 requesting certain information. A copy of the letter is annexed hereto as Attachment 1. Mr. Wilkinson stated that he would like to review all of the information provided by Lansing Engineering and also review the engineering comments from Mr. McNamara.
Lot Line Adjustments
Flynn/Hayes (237-1-49.21 & 237-1-50)
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board could finalize this matter this evening. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the County has responded with no significant impact.
Mr. Kadlecek inquired if the lot line adjustments could be done before the site plan review.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that he was planning to move the lot line adjustments on the Agenda to be reviewed before the site plan review.
Heritage/Palmer (247-1-29.11 & 247-1-29.12)
Mr. Wilkinson stated that this application is for the expansion of the side yard of the Heritage property.
ZBA Referral
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there are no referrals.
Reports
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there would be standard reports. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Zoning Administrator is on vacation.
Correspondence
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there is a Farmland and Open Space Preservation Workshop on July 31, 2008 at 6:30 at the Town of Ballston Town Hall.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the CDTC Road Safety Audit Training is being held on August 18th and August 19th in Schenectady. Mr. Wilkinson stated that anyone planning on attending must RSVP.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that himself, Mr. Keniry, Mr. VanVranken, Mr. Black and Mr. Grattidge have had a meeting on the expansion of the Charlton School for Girls. Mr. Wilkinson stated that some data and some drawings have been submitted.
Mr. Keniry stated that he anticipates that the Planning Board will be considering an application for site plan review regarding the expansion of the Ketchum Grandy Memorial School. Mr. Keniry stated that the school is in the process of pursuing funding from the State of New York relative to the expansion. Mr. Keniry stated that the process is proceeding at the present time. Mr. Keniry stated that until such time as the school has a firmer commitment relative to the funding, they are not in a position to present the Board with any type of final plan for the Board to consider for approval. Mr. Keniry stated that the school is desirous of coming before the Board for a pre-application conference.
Site Plan Review
MPH Properties, LLP (256-1-103)
Mr. Wilkinson inquired if Mr. McNamara had received a response to his letter of July 18, 2008. A copy of the letter is annexed hereto as Attachment 2.
Mr. McNamara stated that he spoke to Mr. Lansing today and the applicants are checking their options and stated that the other issues in the letter were easy to fix.
Mr. Wilkinson read paragraph two of the letter. Mr. Wilkinson stated that he would like to go through the letter:
General:
1. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the applicants are aware that they need a curb cut permit.
2. Mr. Kadlecek stated that he would like to see the storm water management system working properly before considering adding parking spaces. Mr. Kadlecek stated that he prefers 38 parking spaces as the limit and if they need more spaces, they would need to demonstrate the need for those additional spaces. Mr. Kadlecek stated that he would prefer no banking of spaces.
3. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board agrees that 4 ADA parking spaces are acceptable.
4. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the applicants would have to investigate if there are any existing easements regarding the two utility poles.
5. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the applicants would need to clarify the labeling inconsistency regarding the lighting of the sign.
6. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board could discuss the use of internal bulb shielding.
Ms. Szurek stated that there is also a labeling inconsistency with the kind of tree/shrub that will be going in front of the sign.
Sanitary:
Mr. Wilkinson stated that this would be discussed during the meeting.
Storm Water Management:
Mr. Wilkinson stated that this would be discussed during the meeting.
The meeting was closed at 7:28 p.m.
BUSINESS MEETING
Opened at 7:30 p.m. with the Pledge of Allegiance.
Minutes
Mr. Wilkinson made the motion to approve the draft of the June 19, 2008 minutes with changes incorporated. Mr. Kadlecek seconded the motion. All were in favor. Mr. Wilkinson abstained from the vote.
Subdivision Applications
Heflin/Durst (255-1-40.1,41,43.1,43.2,43.3)
No one representing this matter appeared.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there has been no action and this is a placeholder.
Lot Line Adjustments
Heritage/Palmer (247-1-29.11 & 247-1-29.12)
Mr. and Mrs. Heritage appeared before the Board. Mrs. Heritage stated that they are proposing a lot line adjustment to encompass an existing barn on the property. Mrs. Heritage provided an aerial photograph.
Mr. Hodgkins inquired if there was a natural hedgerow.
Mrs. Heritage stated yes in back. Mrs. Heritage stated that the proposal leaves ample setbacks and also leaves the Palmers with 300 feet of frontage.
Mr. Armer inquired as to the type of barn.
Mrs. Heritage stated that it is a storage barn used to store machinery. Mrs. Heritage stated that there are no animals in the barn.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that there are some drawing comments:
-the drawing needs a site location;
-the drawing needs a signature block;
-change the label of barn to shed;
-since changing two properties, both properties need to be shown on the drawing with location of houses, wells and septic.
Mr. Wilkinson explained why it was required that both properties be shown.
Mr. Hodgkins stated that the drawing would need to show anything the lot line would encroach on.
Mr. Keniry stated that the whole parcel could be shown in a box. Mr. Keniry stated that the drawing should depict the gross dimensions of the parcel, especially the road frontage.
Mrs. York inquired if the Board wanted to see the changes before sending the application to the County.
Mr. Wilkinson stated yes and also the application would need to be referred to the Town of Ballston. Mr. Wilkinson reviewed the number of drawings that would be needed for next meeting.
Site Plan Review
MPH Properties, LLP (256-1-103)
Mr. Lansing appeared before the Board.
Mr. Lansing stated that they have received the letter from Mr. McNamara. Mr. Lansing stated that many of the comments were of a technical nature. Mr. Lansing stated that he would like to review two primary comments. Mr. Lansing stated that he would like to address comment #8 under Sanitary and comment #4 under Storm Water Management.
Mr. Lansing stated that comment #8 under Sanitary pertained to rearrangement of the sanitary system to meet the Town of Charlton’s Zoning Ordinance requirements. Mr. Lansing stated that the central area of the system has been left unchanged and they have come up with a revised area for the system, which will now be located on the southeastern portion of the site. Mr. Lansing stated that they have moved the system downhill so there is no longer a need for dosing chambers. Mr. Lansing stated that they will need to check the perc rates but are confident that it will meet the Town’s requirements.
Mr. Kadlecek inquired if they were taking samples in the new area.
Mr. Lansing stated that there are three test pits that are not listed, but are similar.
Mr. Lansing stated that comment #4 under Storm Water Management, they had proposed an area in the back portion of the parcel, two swails going down to two separate filters going to a pocket pond at the back portion of the parcel with 4 feet of water. Mr. Lansing stated that the letter reflected the Board’s desire not to have a wet pond on the site. Mr. Lansing stated that they have gone back to the drawing board. Mr. Lansing stated that they are looking at a potential infiltration basin in the southwest corner of the parcel. Mr. Lansing stated that it would be an infiltration basin so it would be dry with the exception of during a storm. Mr. Lansing stated that in meeting DEC criteria, they would still do 2 swails to the basins at a 1-2% slope. Mr. Lansing stated that pre-treatment would be provided
by 2 grass channels. Mr. Lansing stated that the basin would be 2 feet deep with 18 inches of usable soil. Mr. Lansing stated that the perc rates are similar. Mr. Lansing stated that there would be an underdrain in the bottom of the basin to assist in draining. Mr. Lansing stated that the basin would discharge to the swail along Stage Road to the Alplaus. Mr. Lansing stated that Mr. McNamara also commented on the conceptual size of the basin. Mr. Lansing stated that they are willing to shrink the size of the basin. Mr. Lansing stated that he has been in contact with Mr. McNamara regarding these changes.
Mr. Lansing stated that the rest of the comments would be addressed. Mr. Lansing stated that they would like to receive preliminary approval tonight to move to the ZBA for the granting of the special exception permit.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has received a set of detailed plans. Mr. Wilkinson stated that he would like to go through the information and give feedback. Mr. Wilkinson stated that he would like to begin with Mr. Keniry’s letter of June 26, 2008 (attachment 1).
1. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the soils data has been supplied in the Storm Water Management plan. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the plan would change now that there is a new plan.
Mr. Lansing stated that they would be using test pit #5. Mr. Lansing stated that they do not have the perc data but have the deep hole test information.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board would need the perc test data.
2. Mr. Wilkinson stated that this has been addressed and the applicants will come back with a final design. (for the stormwater and septic systems)
3. Mr. Wilkinson stated that #5 of Mr. McNamara’s letter also commented on the lighting of the sign. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board needs a clarification of upward lighting or downward lighting. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has asked for downlighting.
Mr. Lansing stated that the plan would be revised to reflect downward lighting.
Ms. Szurek inquired if they would be shielding the light.
Mr. Lansing stated that the lighting would be a refracting globe with a shield.
4. Mr. Wilkinson stated that a landscaping plan has been provided.
Ms. Szurek inquired as to the type of planting that would be in front of the sign. Ms. Szurek stated that the plan has a misprint.
Mr. Lansing stated that he would revise the drawing.
5. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has received a stamped survey with the requested information on it.
6. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has received the building elevations and floor plans including the proposed annex area. Mr. Wilkinson stated that it is hard to get the specific sizes of the dimensions because they are unreadable.
7. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board would like to limit the parking lot to 38 spaces with no banking of additional spaces. Mr. Wilkinson stated that if the need arises for more parking spaces, the Board would like the applicants to come back before the Planning Board to demonstrate the need for them.
Mr. Armer stated that the Board would like to see the Storm Water Management System working properly before allowing more parking spaces.
Mrs. Wood asked for clarification of 34 parking spaces and 4 handicapped spaces.
The Board discussed where to pull the two additional handicapped parking spaces from and the capacity of the Storm Water Management System, whether it be for 50 spaces or the approved number of spaces.
Mr. Wilkinson proposed 40 parking spaces with 4 spaces being handicapped accessible and banking 10 spaces for future use with the understanding that the applicants will have to come back before the Board to pave those spaces.
Mr. Wilkinson polled the Board:
Mr. Kadlecek stated that was fine with him.
Mrs. Wood stated that was fine with her.
Ms. Szurek stated that was fine with her.
Mr. Mitchell stated that was fine with him.
Mr. Armer stated that was fine with him.
Mr. Hodgkins stated that was fine with him.
Mr. Lansing stated that would also be acceptable to the applicants.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that he would like to review the July 18, 2008 letter from Mr. McNamara (attachment 2).
1. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the applicant understands that a curb cut permit is required.
2. and 3. Mr. Wilkinson stated that the parking space issues have been addressed.
4. Mr. Lansing stated that Duane Rabbideau has spoken to National Grid regarding the utility poles and that there are no special separation distances because they are not high voltage lines. Mr. Lansing stated that National Grid has requested a copy of the site plan to see that there are no poles in the parking area.
5. and 6. Mr. Wilkinson stated that these have been addressed regarding lighting and landscaping.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the comments under the Sanitary section will be addressed and the necessary changes will be made.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the applicants will be coming back with a new Storm Water Management System. Therefore, the comments in Mr. McNamara’s letter are not applicable.
Mr. Kadlecek thanked Lansing Engineering for their quick response.
Mr. Wilkinson asked Mr. Lansing to make the necessary changes and submit new plans prior to the next meeting.
Mr. Lansing again requested preliminary approval since the changes won’t change the proposed plan. Mr. Lansing stated that they will work with Mr. McNamara to make sure the new plans are acceptable.
Mr. Wilkinson stated that since the applicants have done most of the work in going in this direction, the Board could consider preliminary approval. Mr. Wilkinson polled the Board for yes or no to preliminary approval.
Mr. Wilkinson – yes
Mr. Mitchell – yes
Mrs. Wood – yes
Mr. Kadlecek – yes
Ms. Szurek – yes
Mr. Armer – yes
Mr. Hodgkins stated that he would like the Board attorney to give some input before he gives his answer.
Mr. Keniry stated that as long as Mr. McNamara is fine with it and does not anticipate material and/or substance changes, then it is fine with him. Mr. Keniry suggested that the Board consider acting on SEQRA first, then do the preliminary approval second so that it is done before the application goes back to the ZBA.
Mr. McNamara stated that preliminary approval is fine with him.
Mr. Hodgkins – yes.
Mr. Wilkinson made the motion to designate the Planning Board as lead agency for purposes of SEQRA and declare the action as an unlisted action with a negative declaration. Mr. Mitchell seconded the motion.
Roll call vote was taken:
Mr. Wilkinson – aye
Mr. Mitchell – aye
Mrs. Wood – aye
Mr. Kadlecek – aye
Ms. Szurek – aye
Mr. Armer – aye
Mr. Hodgkins - aye
All in favor.
The Board completed the Environmental Assessment form and answered all questions.
Mr. Wilkinson clarified that the preliminary approval was contingent upon a revised Storm Water Management Plan and a revised septic plan. Mr. Wilkinson asked Mr. Keniry for some wording for the preliminary approval motion.
Mr. Keniry stated that the plan, as it has been presented tonight, is subject to the modifications that have been laid out in the Environmental Design Partnership, LLP letter dated July 18, 2008 and discussions here tonight, and that the Board has made a finding that it is adequate for the intended use.
Mr. Wilkinson made the motion reading from the “Town of Charlton Resolution of Planning Board Approving Plat”. A copy of the resolution is annexed hereto as Attachment 3. Mr. Kadlecek seconded the motion.
Roll call vote was taken:
Mr. Wilkinson – aye
Mr. Mitchell – aye
Mrs. Wood – aye
Mr. Kadlecek – aye
Ms. Szurek – aye
Mr. Armer – aye
Mr. Hodgkins - aye
All in favor.
Mr. Wilkinson asked Mr. Lansing to make the changes and get back to the Planning Board.
Mr. Lansing stated that he would make the changes immediately and get it to Mr. McNamara also.
Lot Line Adjustments
Flynn/Hayes (237-1-49.21 & 237-1-50)
Mr. Wilkinson stated that the Board has received everything required to grant final approval. Mr. Wilkinson stated that County approval has been received.
Mr. Wilkinson made a motion to waive park fees, engineering fees and the Public Hearing. Mr. Kadlecek seconded the motion. All were in favor.
Mr. Mitchell made the motion to designate the Planning Board as the lead agency for the purposes of SEQRA and that the action be classified as an unlisted action with a negative declaration. Mr. Hodgkins seconded the motion. All were in favor.
The Board completed the Environmental Assessment form.
Mr. Wilkinson made the motion to approve the lot line adjustment as Resolution 2008-10 and authorize the chairman to sign the mylars. Mr. Kadlecek seconded the motion. All were in favor.
Resolution 2008-10 was made.
ZBA Referral
None
Zoning Administrator Report
Mr. LaFountain is on vacation and will provide a report next month.
Correspondence
Addressed during the Agenda meeting.
Town Board Liaison
Mrs. Verola stated that the procedure for referrals to the ZBA should be done by letter in order for the Zoning Office to grant denial before the application goes to the ZBA.
Mr. Wilkinson made the motion to adjourn the meeting. Mr. Kadlecek seconded the motion. All were in favor.
The meeting was adjourned at 9:00 p.m.
Respectfully Submitted,
Kimberly A. Caron
Recording Secretary
July 18, 2008 Attachment 2
Mr. Raymond E. Black
Planning Board Chairman
Town of Charlton Town Hall
784 Charlton Road
Charlton, N.Y. 12019
Re: MPH Properties, LLP
Medical Office Building – Stage and Lake Hill Roads
Tax Map Parcel No. 256.00-1-103
Dear Chairman Black:
We have received materials in the application for the proposed Charlton Family Medicine office buildings at the intersection of Lake Hill and Stage Roads. The eleven sheet set of plans are dated June 30, 2008 and were prepared by Scott Lansing, P.E. of Lansing Engineering, PC. Also included in the submittal was an architectural plan of the proposed building and a bound stormwater pollution prevention report. Stormwater hydraulic modeling calculations were included in the bound report.
The plans show a single proposed medical building that is situated such that it reserves an area of the property for possible future expansion. As discussed during the June 4th Planning Board workshop and as recommended by the May 21, 2008 County Planning Board referral, no approvals are to be considered for any future expansion as part of these proceedings. Likewise, our review has not evaluated any of the proposed site features for their adequacy for a second facility. We offer the following comments for your consideration.
General:
1. Access to the site is proposed on Stage Road. This is a county road and the applicant must obtain a curb cut permit from the Department of Works prior to construction. A note to this effect should be added to the plan. The applicant should also confirm that they have submitted a plan for review to the DPW and addressed any of their comments.
2. Parking for the project includes 38 parking spaces and an area reserved for 12 future spaces if needed. We believe this arrangement is appropriate for the proposed use. The Planning Board may wish to address whether the decision to pave the banked spaces will require further Board approval or can be approved by the Zoning Administrative Officer.
3. The plan proposes two ADA accessible parking spaces. Although this is compliant based on the total count, the Board may wish to consider requiring additional spaces. A third accessible space is triggered at a 51 parking space count. The proposed use as a medical facility may also warrant increasing accessible spaces as many patients would presumably qualify as having “mobility impairments” as defined in the ADA guidelines. We recommend increasing the count to four accessible spaces.
4. The existing conditions include two utility poles that cross the property near the north end. The applicant should investigate whether any existing easements impose limiting conditions on the property. For example, parked cars under the utility wires may be an issue depending upon wire height.
5. On sheet LS-1, there is a labeling inconsistency as to whether the entrance sign is to be lit by upward or downward lighting. (See sign detail versus sign landscaping plan) The correct intent should be clarified as this may especially be a consideration of the ZBA as part of the variance request.
6. The proposed landscaping plan (LS-1) and lighting plan (LT-1) each appear to be very comprehensive and propose appropriate conditions. Lighting intensities are commensurate with recommended values for office parking lots. Austrian Pines and Norway spruce trees are also indicated in areas that will serve to limit any lighting or visual impacts on neighboring properties. The use of internal bulb shielding may also be discussed if the Board considers further mitigation necessary.
Sanitary:
1. There are several labeling inconsistencies on sheet DT-2 with respect to the septic tank size. Both a 1,000 and 1,250 gallon tank are specified.
2. Groundwater conditions at a depth of approximately two feet require that the field be constructed as a “built up” system as defined in Section 3 of Charlton’s Zoning Ordinance. Section 3-C-(3) of the ordinance requires inspections and a final certification by the design engineer. A note should be added to the plans specifying that this certification is necessary before a certificate of occupancy will be issued.
3. Several references are made on sheets DT-2 and DT-3 that the percolation rate of the fill material should be between 5 and 30 minutes. These notes should be changed to reflect Charlton’s requirement of a 10-30 minute perc.
4. We recommend that directional drainage arrows and a note be added on sheets LM-1 and on the sewage disposal site plan on sheet DT-2 calling out the diversion swale on the upstream side of the septic system. Although the proposed contours correctly indicate the necessary swale, this feature is often overlooked during construction unless it is more explicitly noted.
5. A detail for the dosing tank needs to be added to sheet DT-3. The pump model should be specified and calculations included to determine the on/off levels for the pump in order to deliver the proper dosing volume.
6. A profile schematic should be added to the plan with elevations specified for each element of the system to ensure that the pressure line is properly drained between doses.
7. The raised system schematic on sheet DT-3 does not match the plan. The inlet angle to the distribution box is incorrect. The plans should also provide for a velocity brake prior to the distribution box.
8. The plans indicate a distance of 2.5 feet between the absorption trench and the point where fill begins to taper back to original ground. Charlton’s Zoning Ordinance details specific dimensions between the drain field and the top of fill. These dimensions are listed in section 3-C-(2) and require a distance of 10 feet in the upstream direction and 25 feet in all other directions. The ordinance also requires that the top of fill point be located at least 25 feet from all boundary lines. Some rearrangement of the system would appear necessary.
9. There is an existing home on the “Shadick” parcel adjacent to the proposed disposal field. The applicant should provide the location and elevation of that existing well in order to ensure that the proper separation distances will be met.
Storm Water Management:
A culvert appears necessary under the proposed entrance road. The applicant should review the water shed at the intersection of the two county roads in order to determine the appropriate size. Culvert details should also comply with the requirements of the Saratoga County DPW.
1. Drainage from the parking areas is directed by surface grades to the southern corners from two directions. Concentrated flow exits the asphalt and flows overland to the storm management area. The grass-asphalt interface may not be adequate stabilization to prevent erosion. We would recommend the use of a permanent turf reinforcement matte for a sufficient distance off the pavement until flow is spread to the broader cross section of the swale.
2. A 10’ wide gravel access road is shown along the southwest corner of the storm basin. As the storm facilities will be privately owned, we question the need for this aesthetically displeasing feature. Access for mowing and maintenance seems adequately provided by overland route.
3. The plans indicate the use of a wet basin design for stormwater management. A clay liner is proposed to an elevation just one foot below the spillway. This will result in a permanent water depth of four feet. The two sediment forebays on either side of the main cell are situated at equal elevations and will have similar conditions. Although no soil results were submitted for test hole locations 3, 4 & 5, it is presumed that high groundwater conditions prompted the wet design. The use of a wet pond at such a high visibility location in the town and for a relatively small project is not preferable.
The adjacent Stage Road ditch line provides access to an elevation that is roughly eight feet lower than the ground surface along the south boundary. We recommend that the design utilize this elevation to promote a dry bottom basin. The main cell of the basin could be located closer to the southwest property corner to take full advantage of this opportunity for positive drainage. If necessary, underdrains could be installed under the sides of the basin to drop the water level below the bottom and allow storm events to infiltrate. The percolation rates of the soils appear well within acceptable values for infiltration according the State Design Manual. A dry infiltration basin may also result in a smaller footprint since its entire volume would be available for storage. Most of the wet basin is wasted
storage because of its permanent pool.
4. The location of the discharge and emergency overflow are also a concern. We recommend that discharge be directed toward the Stage Road ditch line rather than toward the center of the adjacent property. There is an apparent rise in terrain near the tree line that does not seem to be reflected by the existing contours. This fact also inhibits discharge to the location shown without encroaching onto the neighboring property. All runoff combines at the existing stream a short distance from the subject property. We believe discharge to the road ditch line to be a more appropriate route.
If you have any questions concerning this project, please feel free to call.
Very truly yours,
Michael McNamara, P.E.
The Environmental Design Partnership
cc: PB Board Members, Scott Lansing, P.E. , Bill Keniry
Attachment 3
TOWN OF CHARLTON
RESOLUTION OF PLANNING BOARD APPROVING PLAT
Tax Parcel Number: 256-1-103
WHEREAS, Lansing Engineering, Professional Engineers of Malta, New York, on behalf of MPH Properties, LLP, did present for site plan approval, a preliminary plat entitled, Chariton Family Medicine - Capital Care, situated at Stage Road and Lake Hill Road, Town of Charlton , County of Saratoga, New York, and
WHEREAS, notice of a public hearing on such matter was duly published
according to law, and said Planning Board did meet at Town Hall at Chariton, New York, on the 13th day of May, 2008, at 7:00 o’clock PM., the time and place specified in said notice, and did then and there hear all persons interested in the subject matter concerning the same,
Now, THEREFORE, BE IT RESOLVED, that the preliminary plat entitled
Charlton Family Medicine - Capital Care, for MPH Properties, LLP, situated at Stage Road and Lake Hill Road, Town of Charlton, County of Saratoga, New York, be and the same is hereby approved, with the following modifications:
1. approval subject to plan revisions pursuant to July 18, 2008, letter from EDP; and
2. approval subject to comments and direction of the Planning Board made at the
July 21, 2008, meeting.
The Planning Board found and determined the site plan as approved to be adequate for the intended use.
.
signed _____________________________________
Mr. Jay Wilkinson, Acting Chairman - Charlton Planning Board
date ______________________________________
| 
